Noel Larwig vs Alessandro Coccioli Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Nov at 10:49 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Larwig vs A. Coccioli

GER
0
Win
Played
1
Win

ITA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Larwig 0 - 1 Coccioli
They have played 3 sets in total, with Noel Larwig winning 1 and Alessandro Coccioli winning 2. The last match between Alessandro Coccioli and Noel Larwig was at the M15 San Gregorio di Catania, 05-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(7) 2-6 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Larwig | 0 |
| Coccioli | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 San Gregorio di Catania(11-05-25)
N. Larwig vs A. Coccioli H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 47.52% (115-127) | Career Total W/L | 55.10% (54-44) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Larwig vs A. Coccioli Match Preview:
- In the area of second serve performance, Noel Larwig outperforms Alessandro Coccioli by securing 44.72% of points, whereas Coccioli achieves 39.01%. Could this serve reliability be a decisive edge for Larwig?
- Returning prowess indicates Larwig wins 49.07% of opponents' second serve points compared to Coccioli's 46.00%. Additionally, Larwig leads in first serve returns with 36.49% versus Coccioli's 27.14%.
- Assessing clutch play under pressure, Coccioli excels by saving 56.49% of breakpoints, while Larwig saves 46.80%. Does Coccioli's resilience in critical moments give him an advantage?
- Overall match performance over the last year reveals Coccioli with a higher win rate at 62.96% compared to Larwig's 59.26%.
- Both players favor clay as their best surface, each with a win rate of 50%. However, Larwig struggles more on indoor hard courts with a 22% win rate, while Coccioli has a more balanced 53% on hard courts.
- In terms of competition level, both have predominantly participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, with Coccioli slightly leading in match wins.
- Larwig has faced stronger opponents on average, with their opposition ranked around 195.67 compared to Coccioli's 216.33.
- For deciding sets, Larwig is strongly favored, clinching 71% of them versus Coccioli's 50%.
Editorial Prediction (November 5, 2025, UTC):
Examining their recent statistics, Noel Larwig demonstrates superior performance in second serve points and return games, which are strong indicators of a player's likely success in a match. These strengths are pivotal in developing a competitive edge on court.
Alessandro Coccioli, however, shows a notable ability to handle pressure by saving a significant percentage of breakpoints. This mental toughness could be crucial in tightly contested games.
While both players have comparable success on their favorite surface—clay—the deciding factor may lie in Larwig's adeptness at seizing tiebreak situations, as he excels in winning deciding sets.
Considering both players' strengths and past performances, Noel Larwig is predicted to be the likely winner of this upcoming tennis match.
Noel Larwig vs Alessandro Coccioli Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Larwig vs A. Coccioli H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 17 | Games Won | 16 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 0:1:34 | Average Match Time | 0:1:34 |
| 68% (80/117) | 1st Serve % | 68% (80/117) |
| 56% (45/80) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (45/80) |
| 41% (15/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (15/37) |
| 35% (7/20) | Break Pts Won % | 35% (7/20) |
| 49% (70/142) | Return Points Win % | 49% (70/142) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Larwig Recent Matches Played
A. Coccioli Recent Matches Played

N. Larwig vs A. Coccioli Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 47.52% (115/127) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.10% (54/44) |
| 47.95% (257/279) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.00% (126/99) |
| 49.90% (2515/2525) | Games Win/Loss | 53.07% (1148/1015) |
| 48.39% (30/32) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.13% (34/30) |
| 50.00% (81/81) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.82% (20/14) |
| 22.22% (4/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 102 | Aces Total | 129 |
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 227 | Total Double Faults | 148 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 229.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 231.18 |
| 64% (3294/5143) | 1st Serve % | 60% (1762/2944) |
| 58% (1916/3294) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (1177/1762) |
| 45% (827/1849) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (547/1182) |
| 42% (230/550) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (136/304) |
| 42% (2176/5243) | Return Points Win % | 41% (1224/2962) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47.92% (115/125) | Futures W/L | 55.10% (54/44) |
| 47% (113/239) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (54/98) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 32% (9/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (9/21) |
| 47% (25/53) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (11/29) |
| 89% (108/96) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (58/49) |
| 11% (108/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (58/9) |
| 14% (134/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (40/5) |